A look inside
Real pages, not a promise
This is the actual work, not a description of it. Genuine pieces from the notes, flashcards, cheat sheet and exam, so you can see the quality before you spend a cent. It is a taste. The full pack goes a lot deeper.
From the notes
Every definition, done properly
DefinitionStrategic management accounting is management accounting with an outward and forward focus. It supplies information on competitors, customers, markets and the firm's own costs to help form and carry out strategy, rather than only recording internal historical results.
The exact wording to use, pulled out so you cannot miss it.
From the cheat sheet
Budgeting approaches, in one glance
Incremental. last year adjusted.
Zero-based. justify each activity from nothing.
Rolling. add a period as each ends.
Activity-based. budget by activities and drivers.
Every formula, rule and framework, laid out for fast lookup in the open-book exam.
From the flashcards
Porter's five forces, ready to recall
- Rivalry among existing competitors
- The threat of new entrants
- The threat of substitutes
- The bargaining power of suppliers
- The bargaining power of buyers
Together they show the competitive pressure, and so the likely profitability, of an industry.
From the flashcards
74 cards that make recall automatic
FrontDefine a value driver and a cost driver.
BackA value driver is a factor that raises what customers will pay, such as design, quality, delivery speed or service. A cost driver is a factor that causes cost to be incurred. Strategy aims to widen the gap between the two.
Print double-sided, cut, and drill them anywhere.
From the notes
The variance formulas, in one table
| Variance | Formula |
|---|
| Material price | (AP - SP) x AQ |
| Material usage | (AQ - SQ) x SP |
| Labour rate | (AR - SR) x AH |
Plus labour efficiency and the overhead variances, each with when it is favourable.
From the notes
The traps that cost marks, flagged in advance
Exam trapDo not pick the project with the highest IRR when projects are mutually exclusive or differ in size. The defensible choice is the highest NPV. Examiners build scenarios where IRR and NPV point to different projects precisely to test this.
Tips and traps sit right where people slip, so you learn the mistake before you make it.
From the notes
The balance the examiner rewards
Exam trapDo not present participative budgeting as all upside. The marks are in the balance: it builds commitment and uses local knowledge, but it invites budgetary slack and can be slow. A one-sided answer reads as a list learned by rote.
The notes tell you how the marks are awarded, not just what the topic is.
From the practice exam
A full mock, marked like the real exam
Question 30 • Module 4
At a review, a project's earned value is $100,000, its planned value is $120,000 and its actual cost is $110,000. The project is:
- A. Ahead of schedule and under budget
- B. Behind schedule and over budgetAnswer
Fifty multiple choice, six multiple response and five extended response, every one worked through.
Worked solution
Every answer explained, right and wrong
Why B is correctEarned value below planned value gives a negative schedule variance, so the project is behind schedule, and earned value below actual cost gives a negative cost variance, so it is over budget.
Why the others are wrongEarned value is below both planned value and actual cost, so the project is neither ahead nor under. The figures differ, so it is not on schedule or on budget. And it is behind schedule, not ahead, since earned value is below planned value.
Every question is marked up like this. The five extended-response questions come with a model answer and the marking guide, so you can see exactly where the marks sit.